



b. 124
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In the main text we add a staccato dot and a slur in the L.H. part after the markings of FC in analogous bars 22, 24 and 28 and 118, 120 and 122. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 124-125
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
Both versions of slurring are musically justified – the slur of FC begins together with the new four-bar section, while the slur of FE emphasises the fact that the new section derives from the ending of the preceding phrase. We give the slurs of the principal source. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||
b. 124
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
In PE this bar opens a new page. In the L.H. part the previous bar ends in the treble clef, yet in the discussed bar at the beginning of the line there is a bass clef in PE1, followed immediately by a treble clef. This unnecessary complication resulted from a bass clef having been placed by mistake at the end of bar 123, which was then removed, still in PE1 (one can see traces of this mark). In PE2 this version was simplified by placing a treble clef right at the beginning of the bar. In GE, in which – as in our transcriptions – both bars fall in one line, no clefs are necessary here. While performing the correction in PE2 the arpeggio mark before the L.H. chord was removed by mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in PE , Revisions in #PE |
|||
b. 124
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
The missing arpeggio in PE2 (→PE3→PE4) is a side effect of ordering the notation of clefs at the beginning of this bar, which in PE opens a new page of text (see the note above). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in PE , Revisions in #PE |
|||
b. 124
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
In the main text, we add cautionary naturals before d notes in the first chord. category imprint: Editorial revisions |