b. 154
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing is most probably an oversight of the engraver of FE. The marking featured here in GE1 must also be a mistake, which was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , fz – f |
||||||
b. 154-155
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slur's division in EE is an inaccuracy which results from bar 155 starting a new line. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||
b. 154
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A, there is no to the bottom note of the octave. Chopin's patent oversight was corrected by FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
b. 154
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A (→FE), there is no accidental to the last quaver. In this context, it is a patent inaccuracy by Chopin, who would often consider the accidentals defined in the first octave of a scale or passage to be valid in subsequent octaves too (cf. the next bar or, e.g. the Prelude in D minor, Op. 28 No. 24, b. 18). Both GE and EE added a sharp here. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
||||||
b. 154-155
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we keep the different staccato markings visible in A – wedges at the beginning of the bar and dots over the chords. In the editions, as in many other places – see, e.g. variation IV or the finale – all markings were reproduced as wedges (however, in b. 153 the dots under the slur remained dots). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Wedges |