Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 154

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Fingering written into FEJ

No teaching fingering

..

In the main text, we include the Chopinesque fingering written in pencil to FEJ.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEJ

b. 154-155

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No teaching fingering

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 154

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

We add a cautionary ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ before d3 in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 154

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No marking in FE (→GE,EE)

Our alternative suggestion

..

Our alternative suggestion is justified by a comparison with analogous bar 162. Performance of those bars was probably meant to be the same; Chopin simply marked the bar more accurately for the second time. 

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 154

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Staccato dot in A & GE

No mark in FC & FE (→EE)

..

The second octave in this bar is provided in A with a staccato dot (due to smeared ink the mark became distorted, yet, according to us, there is no doubt that the person who wrote it meant a dot). That dot, however, was not reproduced in any of the sources based on A, neither in FC nor in FE (→EE). The reason could have been an oversight or an omission due to the inability to recognize the shape of the mark. GE added a dot most probably by analogy with b. 22 and 46. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors of FC