mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 120-122

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

Long accents in A (→GE→FE)

Short accents in EE
..

In EE, no account was taken of the difference between the accents from bars 120 and 122 visible in A (→GE→FE). The accent in bar 122 in GE1 differs very slightly from the neighbouring short accents, yet this small difference was enough to have its type correctly recognized in FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE inaccuracies

b. 120-146

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

No grace note slurs in A (→GE1→FE→EE)

Grace note slurs in GE2 (→GE3)
..

In GE2 (→GE3), conventional slurs were arbitrarily added connecting grace notes to their main notes.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 120

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

e1 in EE, GC & FE

d1 in GE
..

The minim in the highest voice is not very legible in  GC (it was probably corrected from d sharp1 to e1), so in GE it was misread as d sharp1 .

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC

b. 120

composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major

in A

in GC (→GE) & EE

No indication in FE
..

In GC (→GE) and EE there are no dashes determining the range of the ritenuto indication, while in FE the entire indication. These are most likely oversights.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 120-122

composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor

..

The sources added a cautionary  next to c3 in the R.H. in bars 120, 121 and 122.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: FE revisions