



b. 119
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The f1 note present in FE1 as the bottom note of the R.H. chord must be a mistake, corrected – perhaps by Chopin – in FE2 (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 119-120
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 119
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
When interpreted literally, the A slurs are divided after the 3rd quaver in the bar. The comparison with analogous bar 131, 133 and 135 reveals that the notation is inaccurate. Therefore, to the main text we adopt the interpretation introduced by GE (→FE,EE,IE), in which the slur is divided before the 3rd quaver in the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 119-120
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In A the majority of accidentals to the top notes of even quavers is missing – the only one is the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
b. 119-121
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we suggest supplementing L.H. slurs after authentic markings in the majority of similar motifs in the previous bars. Such slurs were already added by GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |