b. 145-155
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In the sources based directly on [A] there are no naturals raising c to c – in GC in bars 145 and 147, in FE1 in bar 147. These patent inaccuracies were corrected in GE and FE2, so that all the remaining sources include the correct text. Similarly in bars 153 and 155, although there and in FE the second was added only in FE4. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Last key signature sign , Errors of GC |
|||
b. 145-146
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
GC (→GE1) overlooked the dots extending the minims in bar 145. GE1 also omitted the dots in bar 146. The remaining editions include the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of GC |
|||
b. 145-146
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
GE1 lacks the first R.H. slur in each of these bars. It is most probably an oversight by the engraver, corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||
b. 145
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The starting point of the slur in the L.H. in the 1st half of the bar is unclear in A, since it partially blends in with the con forza indication. We assume that the slur runs from the 2nd quaver, since such slurs are present in bars 241-246, based on a similar texture, as well as in bar 32 and 81 in the 2nd movement of the Concerto. The version of the majority of editions may, however, be considered an equal interpretation. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
|||
b. 145
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur in the 2nd half of the bar, added in GE2 and EE is certainly arbitrary, although the analogy with the 1st half of the bar certainly encourages an addition. However, it is puzzling that the reviser of EE added a slur from the 2nd quaver, although in the 1st half of the bar EE has a slur from the 1st quaver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |