|
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The long accent over the penultimate semiquaver was erroneously reproduced in GE1 as a short accent under the last note. In FE (→EE) the accent was placed under the 1st note of the last four semiquavers, which may be a result of Chopin's proofreading. In the main text we give the version of A, since it is uncertain whether Chopin actually changed his mind on accents in the ending of this bar; even if it was him that corrected the text of FE in this place, he would be changing the erroneous accent adopted from GE1 and not the text of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 110-111
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The notation of A is inconclusive on whether the slurs are to be separated between the bars. The slur in bar 110, the last one on the page, reaches beyond the bar line, although it is not clearly visible due to ending ink. A possible continuation of the slur is rather not confirmed by the slur in bar 111, which, although running high over the first semiquavers, suggests with its shape the beginning of a new sign. According to us, both interpretations are equal and in the main text we adopt the solution clearly written in an analogous situation one bar earlier. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur over the first two semiquavers, visible in A, was overlooked in the editions: the engraver of GE1 may have considered it an insignificant, accidental touch of quill. According to us, such a possibility is viable, hence we do not include it in the main text. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The missing wedge in GE may be a mere oversight; however, taking into account possible corrections of FE in the R.H., we assume that it is more likely that the wedge was added by Chopin in the last phase of proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The two missing staccato dots in the R.H. at the beginning of the 2nd beat of the bar in GE is a mistake repeated most probably after the proof copy of FE. It is indicated by numerous traces of proofreading of slurring in FE – at the time of removing the original slur, which reached to the end of the 3rd semiquaver triplet only, the discussed dots were probably also removed (they are the closest to the original slur), which got to GE, while in FE it was completed in the last phase of proofreading. Cf. the note at the beginning of this bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
