b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The accent in the 1st half of this bar may be interpreted as short or long in A. The second possibility is indicated by the even shorter accent in the L.H. in the 2nd half of the bar and by the melodic context. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The accent in the 1st half of the bar may be interpreted as long or short in A. A clearly longer sign is written also in AI. On the other hand, a comparison with analogous accents in the 2nd half of this bar and in bars 1-2 suggests the second possibility and this is how the sign was understood in FE (→GE,EE). According to us, the context, particularly the harmonic one, can justify distinguishing this note with a longer accent. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Long accents |
|||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
in AI was almost certainly intentionally overlooked in the printed version. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 7-8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The chords with repeated d2 and d1 notes are undoubtedly an earlier version of this place. The corrections of AI suggest that originally the first pair of chords had also c2 notes on the 2nd beat and b1 on the 3rd beat, which excluded the hold (if the d2 notes were present in this version at all). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |