|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI the lower note is an erroneous f2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
|||||||||||
|
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In the main text we include the fingering written by Chopin in FED. Fontana suggested identical fingering in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED |
|||||||||||
|
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
The slurs of A in these bars are inaccurate, which was only partially corrected in FE (→GE1). The ambiguity was eliminated in EE and – in a different way – in subsequent GE,s, yet Chopin did not participate in their elaboration. Taking into account analogous bars 14-15, in which Chopin probably corrected the slur, and 38-39, in which he combined the slurs in A, in the main text we suggest a continuous slur from the 2nd quaver in bar 6 to the middle of bar 8. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
Two long accents visible in A were reproduced in FE (→EE; in EE2 the accent in bar 7 was overlooked) in varied ways. GE includes short accents in both bars. There is no reason to assume that Chopin interfered with any of the versions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 6-14
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
At the beginning of bars 6 and 14 we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
before g