



Slurs
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 20-21
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
One can ponder whether the slur of the editions ending before the end of the phrase conveys the notation of [A] and Chopin's intention in general correctly, since it is the notation of [A] that could have already been inaccurate. It is supported by the ending of the tenuto slur of AI, very suggestively encompassing the entire ending of the phrase. Among potential reasons for the inaccuracy of the notation of [A], one could mention ink stoppage or the ending of the slur merging with the accent or ten. On the other hand, there is a very similar situation in the Mazurka in F minor No. 2, bar 8, in which a shorter slur may be related to specific articulation indicated by the fingering. Taking into account the above, in the main text we suggest a slur led to e category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
The slur beginning in AI from the d category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
..
The continuous slur of AI was being created gradually – first Chopin entered a slur running to the f category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |