b. 19-20
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
On the basis of a comparison with analogous bars 45-46, it can be concluded that the shorter slur in FE (→EE) is probably the copyist's or engraver's mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
GE has no cautionary to e1. The accidental in FE was probably added by Chopin at the stage of proofreading of FE1. It is indicated by the lack of planned space for a in this bar and by the presence of naturals in analogous b. 45 and 71, but not 278 and 304. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The lack of hairpin in FE (→EE) is probably an oversight by the copyist or engraver. The lack of hairspin in FE is probably an engraver's mistake, repeated in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Out of the three source versions of the double grace notes present both before the 3rd trill and after it, it is only one that is correct – A-B before and A-B after. It results from a comparison of this bar with four repetitions thereof in b. 46, 72, 279 and 305:
In the discussed bar the missing in GE2 is an oversight of the engraver, while the instead of a in EE1 – most probably a mistake, rectified in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The chord with b1 in EE2 (→EE3) is an arbitrary revision, probably resulting from a comparison with b. 48 and 281, in which the first chord features that note in all sources (probably by mistake). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |