|
b. 33-34
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
Starting from the 2nd beat of b. 33, the R.H. part was enhanced by Chopin; he crossed out the earlier version, which we present below: category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
|||
|
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
FE1 overlooked the accidentals before the 2nd L.H. crotchet. The patent mistake was corrected in FE2 (→EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||
|
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
Due to crossings-out and corrections, the notation of the 3rd beat of the bar is not entirely clear in A, which is proven by the difference between the versions of FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). According to us, it is more likely that Chopin wanted to remove the f category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A |
|||
|
b. 37-38
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
The crossings-out visible in A reveal the initial version of the L.H. part, which we present below: category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A |
|||
|
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
At the beginning of the bar, Chopin wrote cautionary sharps before a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions , Last key signature sign |
. The changes consisted in making the bottom voice independent and in rejecting short slurs in favour of a longer phrase mark. Considerable corrections can also be seen in the following bars – see the notes to 
2 in 
.