|
b. 13
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
Judging from the copies based on [A2], it did not feature the little slur under the group of grace notes. Therefore, we do not include it in the main text, since Chopin probably considered it superfluous. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
|
b. 14
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||||||
|
b. 14
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
We do not include the staccato dot from A1 in the main text, since Chopin most probably did not repeat it in [A2], but wrote a slur, which is conveyed by CJ. The indications can be considered complementary; however, we take into account the fact that Chopin could have considered the dot to be superfluous after having put the slur. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||||||
|
b. 15
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
In A1 one can see a correction of the last semiquaver in the 1st half of the bar, which was initially written as c category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Enharmonic corrections |
|||||||||
|
b. 15
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
The compliance between CJ and CK allows us to believe that the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Balakirev's revisions , Revisions in EL |
3. Chopin then crossed out the 
and enlarged the notehead so that it reaches the line above and looks like d3. The original version is preserved in 
in 
