b. 59
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
Just like in the remaining similar bars (b. 45-57 and 77-88), the sources differ in the placement of the mark, of which we make a note, in spite of the fact that it actually does not influence the performance in this bar. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The absence of pedalling markings in GE may be a result of carelessness of Chopin in [AG] or of the engraver in GE1. Therefore, in the main text we give the pedalling of AF (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The hairpin is one of a few performance indications added in AF (→FE→EE). According to us, it points to one of a few possible interpretations of the beginning of this phrase, hence we include it in the main text in a variant form. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
AI does not include the sostenuto indication. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 61-63
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
Small differences in the placement of the marks are of no practical meaning in this context. In the main text we reproduce the notation of AF (→FE), perhaps more accurate in this fragment – cf. b. 60. EE are lacking in the mark in b. 63, which is most probably a mistake related to the transition to a new page; we consider neither this version nor the absence of pedalling in AI to be a variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , EE inaccuracies |