



b. 38
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In AI there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration |
||||||||||||
b. 39-42
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the AF slur indicating the a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||||||
b. 39-41
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the slur of AF from analogous b. 131-133. The absence of the slur was most probably caused by distraction related to the transition into a new line; Chopin also overlooked the ending of the tenor voice slur. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 41-44
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||
b. 44-45
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
According to us, the double bar line in AI is a trace of change of the key signature for it to correspond to the key of B major; a trace that was left by inadvertence. It is indicated by the absence of such a bar line in GE – Chopin apparently considered it superfluous while writing [AG], in spite of the fact that a new section of different nature begins here. In this situation, the double bar line in AF (→FE→EE) may be explained by the composer's distraction at the time of copying the Mazurka – a reassessment of this issue, although possible, seems to be less likely. category imprint: Differences between sources |