



b. 45-58
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
AI is devoid of pedalling markings in the entire fragment (until b. 91), which does not carry any information about the pedalling itself – Chopin simply did not mark it in the unfinished manuscript; consequently, we do not treat it on a par with the other variants. The category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
b. 46-47
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The pedalling of AF (→FE→EE) was deliberate at the time when it was being written – Chopin crossed out the category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Chopin's hesitations , Deletions in A , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
There is a visible crossing-out of the c category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Accompaniment changes , Corrections of AI |
||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The 2nd quaver in EE is an erroneous d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
It is difficult to say whether the missing b note on the 3rd beat of the bar is an oversight or an intentional change introduced in [AG]; it cannot be excluded that it was performed while proofreading GE1 (cf. similar changes introduced at previous stages of development of the Mazurka's text). Due to the above reason, in the main text we suggest a variant solution – b in brackets. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of GE |