Slurs
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 43-44
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The fact that the slur in FE starts later is probably a mistake caused by the transition into a new line. The correct text in EE is probably a result of revision on the basis of comparison with analogous b. 12-13. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 59-60
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
In the main text we give the longer slur introduced in the proofreading of GE1: one can see traces of the removed ending of the shorter slur, to g1 in b. 59. According to us, that change is to be related to two other ones: the change of rhythm in b. 59 and the removal of d1 at the beginning of b. 60. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||
b. 63-64
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
Two slurs in FE (→EE) may be explained by an unfinished (or simplified) correction, in which the top slur was added – perhaps by Chopin – as an amendment of the bottom one, moved by the engraver to the side of the noteheads (cf. b. 79-80, in which the same slur written above the stave in A1 was reproduced under the notes). In the main text we give the unequivocal notation of A1 and GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 67-68
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
Due to the transfer of the slur near the noteheads, the mark in FE (→EE) seems to be a tie of d2. In the main text we preserve the original Chopinesque notation from A1 and GE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings |
|||||
b. 71
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »