Issues : Placement of markings

b. 1-5

composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major

Long accents in A1 & GE1

Short accents in FE (→EE) & GE2

..

In the main text we give 5 long accents placed between the staves, which corresponds to the unequivocal notation of A1. The notation of GE1 is generally compliant with the above, although it is difficult to say conclusively whether they are short or long accents on the basis of GE1 only; anyway, they are slightly longer than the majority of the accents in the middle section of the Mazurka. The version of the remaining editions, with short accents over the top stave, must be a result of routine revision: the engravers of FE and GE2 reproduced the marks in the same manner, yet independently. 

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , GE revisions

b. 63-64

composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major

Slur in A1 & GE

2 slurs in FE (→EE)

..

Two slurs in FE (→EE) may be explained by an unfinished (or simplified) correction, in which the top slur was added – perhaps by Chopin – as an amendment of the bottom one, moved by the engraver to the side of the noteheads (cf. b. 79-80, in which the same slur written above the stave in A1 was reproduced under the notes). In the main text we give the unequivocal notation of A1 and GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions

b. 65-66

composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major

c1 repeated in A1 & GE

c1 tied in FE (→EE)

..

The tie of c1 is probably a slur of A1, distorted due to a routine shift to the side of noteheads. It is indicated by b. 77-78, in which the slur of A1, written in the same manner, was reproduced in FE as a tie of c1. The right slur, yet also inaccurately reproduced, was probably added in the proofreading of FE (→EE), perhaps by Chopin. We consider the misleading tie of c1 having been left in the text to be an inaccuracy committed in the implementation of the proofreading. In the main text we give the unambiguous notation of A1 and GE

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 67-68

composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major

Motivic slur in A1 & GE

Tie in FE (→EE)

..

Due to the transfer of the slur near the noteheads, the mark in FE (→EE) seems to be a tie of d2. In the main text we preserve the original Chopinesque notation from A1 and GE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings

b. 77-78

composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major

Slur in A1 & GE

Tie in FE (→EE)

..

In FE (→EE) a routine transfer of the slur to the side of noteheads changed the unequivocal slur of A1 into a tie of c1. Unlike in b. 65-66, no attempts were taken to correct that mistake. In the main text we give the unequivocal version of A1 and GE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , Omitted correction of an analogous place