Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Slurs

b. 72

composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major

Slur in A1 & GE

No slur in FE (→EE)

..

The missing slur must be a mistake of the engraver of FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 76-77

composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major

Slur in A1 & GE

No slur in FE (→EE)

..

The missing slur must be a mistake of the engraver of FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 84-103

composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major

2 slurs in A1 & GE

Continuous slur in FE

Slur in bar 103 in EE

..

The version of EE, featuring a slur in b. 103 only, most probably corresponds to the notation of the proof copy of FE, in which the engraver overlooked the slurs over the non-written-out fragment in A1 (b. 84-102). In turn, the continuous slur over all that section present in the finished FE results from proofreading, most probably Chopinesque. In the main text we give two slurs: in b. 84-87 and 87-103, featured both in A1 (interpreted correctly) and GE, since the version of FE, although the latest, was not a change of the thought-out phrasing of A1 and [A2], but an ad hoc correction of a serious mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE