|
b. 492-493
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing L.H. slurs are a typical inaccuracy of Chopin: these bars along with the next two end a page of A; in the further course of this section, already on a new page, all pairs of crotchets after the bass notes are encompassed with slurs. Due to the above, we add slurs in the main text. Such an addition was also introduced in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
|
b. 492-493
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the 5-note slur of A and editions. The longer slur of FC, although most probably inaccurately copied, may be considered an acceptable variant, see b. 494-507. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
|||||
|
b. 493
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing accent in FE must be a result of the engraver's inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
|
b. 493
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A (→FC→GE1, →FE→EE1) there is no accidental before the last crotchet in the R.H. It must be a mistake, cf., e.g. analogous b. 497. Oversight of an accidental necessary for writing a note belonging to a currently valid key is one of Chopin's most frequent mistakes. A natural was added only just in GE2 (→GE3) and EE2 (→EE3); it was also added in FESf. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE , Annotations in FESf |
|||||
|
b. 494-495
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in b. 492-493, the missing slurs must be Chopin's inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
