



b. 268-269
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The reviser of GE2 assimilated the slurring over the b. 268-269 and 288-289 with the slurring of an analogous phrase in b. 369-370. It is difficult to find a justification for that decision: the unquestionable text was changed in three places (also in b. 390-391) on the basis of the fourth, questionable one (the notation of FC in b. 369-370 actually does not suggest a combination of the slurs). Therefore, it comes as no surprise that GE3 returned to the authentic version. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 271-272
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing tie of f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 273-274
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||
b. 273-274
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The omitted ties in FE (→EE) and FC (→GE1) must be mistakes. The tie of E was added in GE2 (→GE3), most probably on the basis of comparison with the analogous places. A tie next to g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors of FC , Annotations in FESf |
|||||
b. 273
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The version of GE1 must be erroneous in this place; Chopin crossed out the E-e octave in A here and replaced it with the E-d seventh. GE2 (→GE3) restored the version of FC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |