b. 274-276
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The longer phrase mark of FC is the original version copied (somehow inaccurately) from A: in A one can see that when it returned to Chopin after having been copied by Fontana, the composer crossed out the original ending of that phrase mark and added a new ending 2 bars earlier. The long, continuous slur in GE1 results from a misinterpretation of FC, rectified in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Deletions in A |
|||||||||
b. 274
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In FE (→EE) the g note is a dotted minim, which is a mistake. The crossing-out in A shows that it was also Chopin that initially wrote it like that; however, he eventually clarified the notation to avoid the g-a cluster at the end of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE , Deletions in A , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||
b. 274-275
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The slurs of GE result from overinterpretation of the slightly too casually put slurs of FC, which clearly begin before the crotchet, particularly in the L.H. Such interpretation of a minor inaccuracy of FC confirms the predilection of the engravers of GE, known from other Chopin's pieces, for adjusting slurs and dynamic hairpins to rhythmic units, e.g. bars. See also b. 273. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 278-280
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 278-280
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary natural before a in b. 278 and 280 and a before g in b. 279. Naturals were also added in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |