|
b. 316-319
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we add pedalling after two previous appearances of this sequence. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
|
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of EE and GE3 is a revision unifying this bar with analogous bar 324. It cannot be ruled out that FE misinterpreted the notation of [A] in this place, hence that version may be considered an equal variant. However, in the main text we preserve the notation of FE (→GE1→GE2), which, despite being apparently less accurate, suggests a performance nuance that was perhaps intended by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The added wedge may be considered justified – in analogous bars the respective note is always marked staccato. In spite of that, in the main text we preserve the version of FE (→GE1→GE2), since the note may be considered to be the first appearance of the top pedal note, and it cannot be excluded that Chopin imagined it being performed differently than before. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 321-325
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 321-326
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In bars 321-322 and 325-326, quaver rests filling the rhythmic values of the top voice were added in EE and GE3. We preserve the sparing notation, typical of Chopin, avoiding excessive formalism. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
before f
2 in bars 321 and 325. The latter was added already in