|
b. 297-299
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), all octaves in the L.H. in bar 297 and the first two in bar 299 are written in an abbreviated manner (top notes with 8s under them). According to us, one of those digits – the last in bar 297 – was perhaps left by mistake, which is indicated by a comparison with analogous bar 69. However, we do not suggest that version here, since the entire Tutti shows numerous minor differences between the first and second time, whereas the aforementioned quaver is provided with a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Abbreviated octaves' notation |
||||||
|
b. 297
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The dots added in GE3 under the octaves in the L.H. in the 2nd half of the bar are an arbitrary revision of the editor. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 299
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slur in GE1 (→GE2) is probably an oversight of the engraver. A shorter slur was added in GE3 on the basis of comparison with analogous bar 71 or with the part of violins I in FEorch (→GEorch). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 299
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The staccato dots with which GE3 provided the quavers in both hands in the 2nd half of the bar are an arbitrary addition of revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 299
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The accent in GE is a revision or a mistake, which, according to us, is more likely. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
mark in bar 297, which may be considered a justification of the sound enhanced with an octave.
