b. 256-257
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
From the pianistic point of view, the division of the slur in GE3 is justified – it is most likely that both the present figures and those in bars 250-252 are to be performed with the same articulation Chopin indicated for the first time in the L.H. part. However, the slur of the remaining sources may be understood as phrasing and not articulation, hence we preserve it in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 256
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 256
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 257
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In GE1 (→GE2), there are no naturals lowering c and c1 to c and c1. They were probably added in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→EE). Naturals were added also in GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE |
|||||
b. 258
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
A shift of the mark most probably resulted from lack of space in [A] – in FE in bar 254 the mark is also placed next to the note and not under it, but it does not cause confusion there. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |