b. 509
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing dynamic markings seem to be an oversight of Chopin – cf. analogous bar 505. In the main text, we suggest four markings modelled after those we adopted in that bar. The three accents in GE3 were most probably added after bar 508. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 513
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The revision of GE3, unifying the slurring of bars 512-513 and 514-515, seems to be superfluous – the first time, the slurs articulate the rhythmic division of the passage's descending part, resulting from its very structure; the second time – they emphasise the unity of the entire virtuoso figure. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 514
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 514
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 516-517
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Originally, the slur of the R.H. encompassed only bar 517, which may be observed on the basis of the traces of its proofreading, visible in FE at the beginning of this bar. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |