b. 469
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
It seems likely that the accent in FE (→GE1→GE2) was placed over a wrong note (instead of over the dotted g3 quaver). This is how it was interpreted in EE and GE3, in which this mark was omitted, and an accent in the middle of the bar was added. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 469-470
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Just like in bar 462, the missing slur must be an oversight; the slur was added only in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 470-471
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Shorter slurs than in analogous bars 458-459, 462-463 and 466-467 must be an inaccuracy, hence in the main text we give slurs encompassing entire little passages. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 471
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 471-472
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
A comparison with analogous bars 463-464 points to a high likelihood of the ending of the slur having been inaccurately reproduced in the sources. In the referred situation, two slurs combine the e1-g1 third with the preceding passage, in spite of the change of dynamics that emphasises the beginning of the eight-bar section. See also bars 459-460. category imprint: Editorial revisions |