|
b. 462
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We omit the accent in the main text, which could have been placed here by mistake – in analogous bars 458, 466 and 470, the respective crotchet is not accented. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 462
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slur must be an oversight. The slur was added in EE, yet it encompasses only the semiquaver triplet (its range is not entirely clear – the slur reaches slightly further than a similar slur in the previous bar). In the main text, we add a slur encompassing the entire figure like in the majority of analogous figures. The same slur was added also in GE3. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 463
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 464
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
It seems that the accents here and in bar 469 were misplaced in FE. In the discussed bar, the mark was probably supposed to concern the crotchet in the L.H. Such an interpretation was adopted in GE3; however, it is only one of a few possibilities, out of which all the major ones are represented in the sources. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 464-465
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We consider the shorter slur in bar 465 to be inaccurate, on the basis of comparison with similar motifs, and we prolong it in the main text after bar 464. In GE3, both slurs were changed to those present in the sources in analogous bars 456-457. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
mark. The mistake was rectified in 
