mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : GE revisions

b. 68-72

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In Atut (→FE), the minims in bars 68 and 72 are devoid of extending dots, which, in both cases, must be considered a mistake. Dots were added in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A

b. 69

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No marking in Atut (→FE→EE)

in GE
..

The  indication in GE is either a revision by analogy with bar 61 or a mistake resulting from the similarity of these bars (concerning their position as well – both bar 61 and 69 open new lines of text).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 75

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Crotchet B1-B in Atut

Crotchet B1 in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Grace note B1 in GE3
..

In the main text, we keep the notation of Atut, since the notation of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), musically equal, probably originated by chance. The version with grace note is one of the elements of the complex revision of GE3, which, moreover, included added fingering and pedalling. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 75

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No fingering in Atut (→FE→EE,GE1→GE2)

Fingering in GE3
..

The fingering of GE3, although undoubtedly reasonable, is certainly arbitrary.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 75

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No pedalling in Atut (→FE→EE,GE1→GE2)

    in GE3
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions