Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 81-82
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing hairpin is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 (→GE2), the accent over d3 took the form of a short mark (long accent?), starting already over c3. In GE3, the inaccurate mark was omitted, although a respective mark in an analogous figure 4 bars later allowed for an easy reconstruction of the correct notation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The pronounced wedge written in Atut (→FE→EE) was reproduced in GE as a dot, which is a typical revision (inaccuracy?) of these editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of the hairpin is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE3, the first chord was arbitrarily provided with a wedge; moreover, the beginning of the slur was moved – see the adjacent note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |