Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 177
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing accent in GE must be an oversight. The long accent in EE1 seems to be an inaccuracy, which EE2 (→EE3) tried to correct by shifting the mark slightly to the left. In such a context, it is highly likely that it is a long accent that corresponds to the notation of [A]. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in GE |
||||||||||
b. 181
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest including the accent placed in the respective bar of the recapitulation (bar 536). category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||
b. 193
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest including the accent placed in the respective bar in the recapitulation (bar 548). category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||
b. 204
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding staccato dots after analogous bar 206. Articulation markings (staccato, slurs) and accents are quite numerous in this fragment, yet inconsistent. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||
b. 210
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Changing the accent's font to vertical is a characteristic manner of the engravers of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |