Issues : Errors repeated in EE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 428
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there are no sharps before the 6th semiquaver in the L.H. (c2) and the middle semiquavers on the 3rd beat of the bar in the R.H. (c3 and d3). All those patent inaccuracies were corrected in GE, whereas in EE it was only the mark in the L.H. that was added. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 434
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE1,GE1→GE2), the 1st quaver is not encompassed with the octave sign. This patent mistake was rectified in EE2 (→EE3) and GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 482-484
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there are no accidentals before the 7th semiquaver in the L.H. in bar 482 and the penultimate semiquaver in the R.H. in bars 483 and 484. Therefore, those notes should be interpreted as f and f1, which would interfere with the regularity of the figuration, undoubtedly intended here by Chopin. The first two oversights were corrected in GE and in EE2 (→EE3), probably on the basis thereof. The mistake in bar 484 remained uncorrected in all editions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 561
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no raising c3 to c3. The patent mistake was corrected in GE and EE. In turn, the missing restoring g3, necessary in this context, even as a cautionary accidental, was added only in GE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 582
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE), the sharp is placed over the grupetto mark. The patent mistake was corrected in GE by removing the erroneous mark. In the main text, we move the to under the grupetto, since c2 as the bottom note of the grupetto seems to be more natural than c2, and the intended mark () having been misplaced is more likely than the erroneous one having been added in a place where it was totally absent. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Annotations in FEJ , Errors repeated in EE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »