Issues : Errors in GE

b. 81-82

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

 in Atut (→FEEE)

No sign in GE

..

The missing  hairpin is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 88-89

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

b tied in Atut (→FE)

b repeated in GE & EE

..

The little tie sustaining is so poorly visible in FE that it was overlooked both in GE and EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE

b. 98

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

 in Atut (→FEEE)

No sign in GE

..

The absence of the  hairpin is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 105-117

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

3 long accents in Atut

3 short accents in FE (→EE)

2 short accents in GE

..

We give the long accents in bars 105, 107 and 117 after Atut. In the editions, they were reproduced as short ones, whereas in GE, the mark in bar 105 was overlooked.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE

b. 111

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Wedge in Atut, contextual interpretation

Dot in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE

..

In Atut, the first third in this bar is provided with two staccato marks – a dot under the notes and a wedge over them. Chopin perhaps put the second mark sometime after the first one, which he did not notice when reviewing the manuscript. However, it is uncertain which of the marks was "first." In the main text, we decided to put the wedge, more frequently used by Chopin in that period of his life in similar situations. In FE (→EE), there is a dot, which was probably overlooked in GE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges