Issues : Errors in EE

b. 88-89

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

b tied in Atut (→FE)

b repeated in GE & EE

..

The little tie sustaining is so poorly visible in FE that it was overlooked both in GE and EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE

b. 150-152

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fingering in EE1

Fingering in EE2 (→EE3)

..

According to us, the likelihood of the authenticity of Fontana's fingering in EE is minimal. In EE1, it clearly contains a mistake – the 3-5 sequence under the 4th and 5th semiquavers is very inconvenient. The mistake was corrected in EE2 (→EE3), changing the digit under gto a '4'. However, it seems to be more likely that Fontana projected the fingers 3-4 for these notes in order to avoid the 5th finger on the black key – the use of the regular scheme 512451... would not have required such a detailed marking; it would have been enough to repeat 51 at the beginning of the subsequent groups of semiquavers, like in bars 142-143. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 153-154

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Staccato dots in FE

No marks in GE & EE

..

The missing staccato dots in EE and GE may be attributed to either a common oversight of the engraver or an omission due to misunderstanding of this subtle articulation detail – cf. a similar situation in the Concerto in F minor, op. 21, the 1st mov., bar 90

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE

b. 170

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Crotchet a in FE (→GE) & EE3

Quaver a in EE1 (→EE2)

..

The missing stem extending must be a mistake of EE1 (→EE2), corrected in EE3 most probably on the basis of comparison with analogous bar 525.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 181

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

The fact that is to be held is marked in FE (→GE) through an additional stem and extending dot for the 4th semiquaver. In further bars, Chopin already applies the notation with tie; therefore, in the main text, we adopt this more exact notation also in this case (similarily in bar 537). In EE1 (→EE2), the note was not held, which was corrected in EE3, most probably on the basis of comparison with the respective bar of the recapitulation.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE