Pitch
|
b. 307-310
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In each of these bars, FE features a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|
|
b. 308
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
FE feature an erroneous e as the 6th semiquaver – cf. bar 292. The mistake was corrected in the remaining editions and in FEH. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
|
|
b. 309
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), there is a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Last key signature sign |
|
|
b. 311
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|
|
b. 314
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The traces visible in FE prove that, originally, the top voice was led differently: category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Main-line changes |
before the 1st semiquaver; however, in the further part of the passage, respective notes in other octaves are devoid of marks. These patent inaccuracies, most probably repeated after [A], were corrected in the remaining editions.
before d
2 in the last chord. The mark, superfluous in this context, was removed in 
. It is the slur, removed at the time of that proofreading, that particularly draws attention – one can ponder whether it was not supposed to be adapted to the new shape of the melody and not to be removed. However, uncertain as to the range of a possible slur, we do not suggest any addition.