Pitch
|
b. 298
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The traces of proofreading in print, visible in FE, allow us to state that the penultimate semiquaver was initially a b1. It was most probably the original version, since it seems to be highly unlikely that the note could have been printed by mistake. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 300
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The most bottom note of the quaver chord in GE1 is an erroneous f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 300
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1, the last note in the L.H. is an e1. A comparison with analogous bars 284, 286 and 302 proves the engraver's mistake. It was corrected in subsequent GE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 302
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with the five bars, which had already occurred, containing a similar procedure proves the mistake of GE1 (→GE2), corrected in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 304
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The manner the 4th semiquaver was printed in FE raises doubts concerning its pitch; it may have been supposed to be a b3, like in the majority of the editions in analogous bar 288. Due to this reason, we consider that it is permissible to play b3 here if one chose b3 in bar 288. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
1, which was corrected already in 
