Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 667

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

marcato between staves in FE (→EE)

marcato over L.H. in GE

..

The marcato indication almost certainly refers to the thematic motif in the L.H., which is indicated by the meaning of that indication and by a comparison with analogous bar 229. Engravers would often misplace indications and other marks or assign them to the wrong hand.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 667-670

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

 &  in FE

​​​​​​​ in GE & EE

​​​​​​​ ​​​​​​​suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we prolong the wavy lines emphasising the duration of the trills. Neither the range of the wavy lines nor the fact whether they were used in the notation at all influences the performance manner of the trill, hence we choose the most suggestive notation. Chopin would write longer, continuous trills in various ways – cf. e.g. the Waltz in D​​​​​​​ Major, Op. 64 No. 1, bars 69-72.  

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 668-670

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

cresc. in FE (→EE)

No indication in GE

..

The missing cresc. - - - indication in GE may mean that Chopin added it in the last proofreading of FE. In EE, the indication was divided into syllables.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 670

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

The 2nd minim in the notation of the tremolando in FE is only the a2-b2 second. The missing f​​​​​​​3 is a patent mistake – cf. previous bars – corrected in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions

b. 670

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Trill ending in FE (→EE)

No R.H. termination in GE1 (→GE2)

No R.H. ending, L.H.slur in GE3

Endings & slurs in both hands suggested by the editors

..

The missing ending of the trill in the R.H. must be a mistake of GE. Taking into account the version of analogous bar 332, one can wonder that generally meticulously revised GE3 did not add that ending, although a little slur to the grace notes in the L.H. was added. In the main text, we add little slurs to both endings of the trills, precisely after bar 332. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE