Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 432
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In spite of this and a few other minor inaccuracies, the need to perform the quavers opening particular bars staccato is unquestionable in the sources. Wedges were added already in EE and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 437-438
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In this context, the missing staccato marks must be considered an inadvertence of Chopin or the engraver of FE, which was noticed already in EE and partially – only in the R.H. – also in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 438
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
As in the case of bar 431, the staccato dot is almost certainly an inaccuracy of notation, which was noticed already in EE and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 438
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato mark for the 1st quaver in the L.H. must be considered an inadvertence of Chopin or of the engraver of FE in this case. The wedge was added in GE and EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 440
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
As in the previous case (cf. bars 416-422), GE3 arbitrarily provided the first two semiquavers with staccato dots. There is a similar situation in bars 442, 444 and 446. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
