b. 470
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 470
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), the pedalling marks must be inaccurate in this place. It is the mark, placed clearly after the bass octave, that may be particularly misleading. This was most probably caused by the low-placed bass note whose stem points downward, which hampered the notation. In turn, the mark was placed before the end of the ascending passage, which, even if it corresponds to the notation of [A], must be considered an inaccuracy. A natural pedalling encompassing the entire bar was introduced in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 471
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slur could have been added in FED, see the note in bar 470; it reaches the 2nd crotchet in the bar. According to us, it is, however, highly likely that Chopin wanted to use it to emphasise the d1-e1 step in the tenor voice. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 471
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The cautionary natural before C seems to be equally justified as the authentic mark before g3. In the main text, we add also a before c3. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
b. 471
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the majority of the sources, the mark is placed inaccurately, although it is unclear what the reason for it was (cf. a more explicit situation in the previous bar). In the main text, we consider the revision of GE3 to be correct (but see the next note). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |