b. 419-423
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The notation of the sources, in which it is only the 2nd semiquaver of the four-note figure that was separated and prolonged, appears in such a context a few times – the 2nd figure in bars 419 and 421, the 2nd and 3rd figures in bar 423 and both figures in bars 442-443. In terms of rhythmic values, this notation generally does not differ from the notation used in the remaining figures; however, it shows the middle voice in a less precise manner. Therefore, it is difficult to assume that Chopin could have intentionally preserved both notations – according to us, this notation is the original version, left by inadvertence, hence in the main text we give the more precise notation of the remaining figures. Cf. similar figures in the Etude in C minor, op. 10 no. 4, bars 3-11. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 419-422
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FEH, the fingering of the endings of the phrases at the transition between bars 419 and 420 and 421 and 422 is natural; however, it is uncertain whether it was indicated by Chopin. The digit at the end of bar 419 was changed – '5' was transformed into a '4'. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 419-421
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In bars 419 and 412 Fontana consistently prescribes the 2nd finger for one of the top notes of the 3rd beat. Cf. bars 417-418. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 420
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing hairpin is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE1, unless the mark was added in the last proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 420
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE |