|
b. 25-27
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the wedges with which the accompanying chords in the L.H. were provided in FE (→GE,EE) are a result of misunderstanding the notation of Atut in bars 26-27, where the repeated chords are written in an abbreviated manner as minims with quaver tremolos. Willing to draw the attention to this abbreviation, Chopin marked the individual quavers with dashes, which he then tried to transform into dots, generally used for this purpose. This measure turned out ineffective, whereas the engraver (reviser?) not only included the wedges, in spite of renouncing the abbreviation, but he also propagated wedges in bar 25. However, since the wedges do not mark articulation, they are superfluous and misleading in a notation that does not make use of abbreviations. Taking into account the above considerations, we do not include them in the main text. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Corrections in A , Wedges , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 25-28
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The range of the slur of Atut is unquestionable, although it reaches neither the first nor the last note of the phrase. However, in FE, the ending of the slur was reproduced incorrectly; in GE, attempts were taken to correct it. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 26-27
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In Atut and GE3, the chords in the L.H. are written in an abbreviated manner in these bars, as minims with quaver tremolos (a similar situation in bars 28-35). This notation provoked a misunderstanding concerning the articulation of these chords – see the note in the previous bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Abbreviated notation of A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Uncertain notes on ledger lines |
|||||||||||
|
b. 28-38
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In bars 28-35 and 37-38, Chopin used in Atut an abbreviated notation of the repeated quavers. In FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), the abbreviations were explained, like in our system. In bars 28-35, identical abbreviations were re-introduced in GE3. According to us, this compliance is accidental, which is supported by the fact that the notation in bars 37-38 differs – Chopin would use abbreviations to minimise writing, whereas the primary aim of the engraver of GE3 was to save space. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Abbreviated notation of A |
