mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 494-495

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No slur in FE (→GE,EE)

Slur suggested by the editors
..

In the main text, we suggest adding a slur on the basis of an analogous motif in bars 1-2.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 495-497

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

There is no accidental in FE before the upper note of the 2nd L.H. octave in bar 495 and 497. The obvious inaccuracy was corrected in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 496

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No slur in FE (→GE,EE)

Slur suggested by the editors
..

In the main text, we suggest adding a slur over the quavers that, in analogous place in the exposition, were encompassed with a slur along with the next bar in FE (→GE,EE). 

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 497

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

There is no accidental before the upper note of the 2nd octave in the L.H. in FE. The patent inaccuracy was corrected in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves

b. 497

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

​​​​​​​in FE (→EE)

No sign in GE
..

The missing ​​​​​​​ hairpin is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE