![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 2
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
In GE (→FE) Chopin's dolce was replaced with the abbreviation dol. In EE the full name of the term was restored. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
GE2 has the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The sources differ with regard to the form of the beam in the 2nd half of the bar. Both the graphic detail differentiating GE from the other sources (the placement of the demisemiquaver beam) and the easy to correct mistake of FE (→EE) – the last sixth having the value of a quaver – have no bearing on the interpretation of the text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The version with f2 is possible both from the harmonic and the melodic point of view. However, it seems much more probable that Chopin omitted the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |