mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 129

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slur in FE (→GE)

EE1

EE2 (→EE3)
..

The slur, inaccurately reproduced in EE1, was revised in EE2 (→EE3) by adding a second one, which makes the slurring resemble the one that the sources contain in bar 127.

category imprint:

issues: EE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 131

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

The engraver of GE overlooked the staccato dot for the 1st quaver in the L.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 132

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Long accent in FE (→EE)

Short accent in GE
..

The accent, clearly long in FE, was shortened in GE to a typical, short mark. It is a typical inaccuracy, resulting from a routine approach to the issue of accents.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 133

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Long accent in FE

Short accent in GE & EE
..

In GE and EE, the accent mark was reproduced as a typical, short accent.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 133

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In EE1, there is no ending of the slur on a new line. The mistake was corrected already by the reviser of EE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE