b. 121
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In EE, there is a short accent. It is an arbitrary revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
A slurring that separates the grace note from the subsequent quaver is unnatural and points to a possibly inaccurate interpretation of the notation of [A]. However, it is unclear which slurs Chopin meant:
In the main text, we adopt the latter, taking into account the slur in analogous bar 274. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
b. 123
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 123-124
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In the main text, we suggest moving the beginning of the slur to over the e1-b1 fifth. In the remaining five similar places, the slur always starts in this fragment of the phrase (the beginning of the four-bar section), which strongly supports the possibility that the slur of the sources in the discussed bar is inaccurate. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
b. 125
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The fact that the slur of FE does not reach the c1-a1 sixth was considered an inaccuracy already in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |