mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 87

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In FE (→GE,EE1), there is no accidental before the last semiquaver in the R.H. in the 1st half of the bar. The mistake was corrected in EE2 (→EE3).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals

b. 88

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Tied a in FE (→GE,EE)

Possible motivic slur
..

As in bar 5, in view of the absence of [A], it is difficult to expressly state whether it is a tie or a slur, combining both a notes, that complies with Chopin's intention. A comparison with similar motifs in bars 84, 236 and 240, in which the common note of the dyads is repeated, indicates that it could be a slur.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 88

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Long accent in FE

Hairpin in GE

Short accent in EE
..

As in bar 84, the long accent in FE was interpreted in opposite way in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE

b. 88

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

We add a cautionary ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ before d1 in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 89

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Fingering written into FEJ

No teaching fingering
..

We add the fingering digit written in pencil to FEJ.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEJ