data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
FE1
compare
As in bar 5, in view of the absence of [A], it is difficult to expressly state whether it is a tie or a slur, combining both a notes, that complies with Chopin's intention. A comparison with similar motifs in bars 84, 236 and 240, in which the common note of the dyads is repeated, indicates that it could be a slur.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context
issues: Inaccuracies in FE
notation: Slurs