mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 82

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Fingering written into FEJ

No teaching fingering
..

We include the Chopinesque fingering digit written in pencil to FEJ.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEJ

b. 83

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

before last quaver in FE

on last quaver in GE & EE
..

In GE and EE, the  mark was moved to under the last quaver. It is an inaccuracy of the engravers.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies

b. 84

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Long accent in FE, contextual interpretation

​​​​​​​ hairpin in GE

Short accent in EE
..

The mark in FE paired with  denotes a long accent in this context. A slight prolongation of the mark in GE made it clearly a  hairpin. EE correctly considered the mark to be an accent and reproduced it as a standard, short accent. The same applies to bar 88. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE

b. 85

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

2 accents in FE (→GE,EE)

1 accent in GE
..

In GE, the reviser abandoned two separate accents for the last crotchet in favour of one mark for both hands. There is a similar situation in bar 237.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 86

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

We add cautionary flats​​​​​​ before a1-a​​​​​​​2 in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions