b. 55
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In the sources, the octave sign does not encompass the grace note, as a result of which, when interpreted literally, it is a b1 and not a b2. The notation of analogous bar 64 proves a mistake in the placement of the octave sign. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Errors in FE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The missing staccato mark is almost certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The engraver of EE overlooked the pedalling markings in bar 60. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Small differences concerning the range of the mark between the sources are insignificant in this context; it also applies to the differences between analogous bars. In the main text, we suggest a hairpin modelled after the first appearance of this phrase (bars 53-54) – it is likely that Chopin wrote the mark most carefully for the first time. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |