Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 55

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In the sources, the octave sign does not encompass the grace note, as a result of which, when interpreted literally, it is a b1 and not a b2. The notation of analogous bar 64 proves a mistake in the placement of the octave sign.

category imprint: Interpretations within context

issues: Errors in FE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 57

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Wedge in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE

..

The missing staccato mark is almost certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 60

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Pedalling in bar 60 in FE (→GE)

No pedalling in EE

..

The engraver of EE overlooked the pedalling markings in bar 60.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 61-62

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

in FE (→GE)

​​​​​​​in EE

​​​​​​​suggested by the editors

..

Small differences concerning the range of the  mark between the sources are insignificant in this context; it also applies to the differences between analogous bars. In the main text, we suggest a hairpin modelled after the first appearance of this phrase (bars 53-54) – it is likely that Chopin wrote the mark most carefully for the first time.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies

b. 63

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No pedalling in FE (→GE,EE)

Pedalling suggested by the editors

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE