mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 64

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No mark in FE (→GE)

Slur in EE
..

The reviser of EE arbitrarily added a little slur combining the grace notes with the main note, most probably by comparison with the next bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 66-67

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No indications in FE (→GE,EE1)

 &  in EE2 (→EE3)
..

The contrasting dynamic indications are a completely arbitrary addition of the revision of EE2 (→EE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 69-70

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No slur in FE (→GE)

Slur in EE2 (→EE3)
..

The slur of EE2 (→EE3) is an arbitrary addition of the revision.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 69

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

GE contains an additional crotchet stem next to the 5th semiquaver, b1, which is a mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 70

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

At the beginning of the bar, GE contains a c2 instead of f2 in the top voice in the R.H. A distorted melodic progression and a superfluous hold of c2 in this version prove the engraver's mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE